"The CHURCH says media should not immediately name a
suspected priests on the basis of mere allegations. For priests, their
only investment is their good name. While the MEDIA says priests who are
suspected of committing criminal offense are treated like an ordinary
suspect, whether he is a pastor or monsignor."
Both
church and media have their own point. Both can shape and change the
way living. It is hard to judge which of them is correct. For me, media
only do their job. Media is a business and it is a competition. That’s
why every media needs a story to sell, which is unusual to the public.
But they must know what kind of story they would publish. Media should
not immediately name a suspected priest on their basis of mere
allegations, because at first priest is person and a person is not
perfect, no one is exempted to commit a sin and they are not a ordinary
people. Second is no one could already believe a priest if his name has
already a bad record. But priest must also know their responsibility to
be a role model of each believer of God. They must also think that not
only their self are to be affected but the parish or the church where
they belong could also be affected. For my own opinion, media can be
called traitor if he or she writes bad issues against his or her church.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento